Amicus Brief: North Carolina Supreme Court - Townes v. Portfolio Recovery Associates (PRA)

The Center for Responsible Lending, Legal Aid of North Carolina, North Carolina Justice Center, National Association of Consumer Advocates, Charlotte Center for Legal Advocacy, Financial Protection Law Center and Pisgah Legal Services partnered to filed this amicus brief in the North Carolina Supreme Court in Townes v. Portfolio Recovery Associates (PRA). Townes v. PRA is principally about the interpretation of...

Amicus Brief in Support of Indigent Defendants Charged with Unaffordable Criminal Fines and Fees

From the amicus brief: Unpaid court debt balloons over time as fines and the costs of collection accrue; low-income people risk wage garnishment, asset forfeiture, loss of credit, and even incarceration as collateral consequences of their continued entanglement with the criminal justice system. These burdens fall most heavily on people of color, who are arrested and placed on probation at...

Amicus Brief: McCoy Student Debt Bankruptcy Discharge

Today the Center for Responsible Lending (CRL) filed this brief in the Supreme Court in support of Thelma McCoy's petition to have the court take up undue hardship discharge for student debt in bankruptcy. Currently and for some time, different courts of appeal have split in how they interpret what is "undue hardship," with some courts taking a holistic "totality...

Amicus Brief: Support for the Case Against OCC Rule that Encourages Predatory Lending through “Rent-a-bank” Schemes

Civil rights and consumer groups -- Center for Responsible Lending, National Consumer Law Center, East Bay Community Law Center, National Association for Latino Community Asset Builders, and National Coalition for Asian Pacific Americans Community Development – filed an amicus brief in support of the attorneys general of California, Illinois, and New York in their case against a rule from the...

Amicus Brief Regarding Lacewell v OCC 2nd Circuit

From the amicus brief: This case concerns the authority of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to extend the privileges of national banks to entities that do not accept deposits and are not banks in any traditional or legal sense. The foremost reason why non-banks will seek out a “special purpose national bank” is to take advantage...

Defending the Constitutional Structure of Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

Download the amicus brief submitted by the Center for Responsible Lending (CRL) and Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll PLLC (Cohen Milstein) to the United States Supreme Court in the case of Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau  (CFPB) on behalf of their clients, community development financial institutions (CDFIs) Self-Help Credit Union, Hope Enterprise Corporation / Hope Credit Union...

Amicus Brief in Support of Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro’s Lawsuit Against Navient Corporation

Currently in the United States, approximately 43 million people owe over $1.4 trillion on their federal student loans. Americans owe more in student loan debt than for auto loans, credit cards, or any other non-mortgage debt.2 Student loan servicers play a critical role in these borrowers’ financial lives, from receiving and applying payments to interacting with struggling borrowers to facilitate...

Amicus Brief in Support of D.C.’s right to Pass Laws Protecting Against Abuse of Student Loan Repayment Plans

The brief filed in Student Loan Servicing Alliance v. Taylor, et al. urges the court to reject the plaintiff loan servicer association’s “federal preemption” argument, which claims that existing federal law bars states and the District from engaging in any regulatory oversight of loan servicers. As the brief highlights, this preemption argument is legally unfounded and unwise. In fact, D.C.’s...

Court Rejects Mulvaney & Payday Lenders' Joint Motion to Delay Payday Rule

Before the court in the above styled and numbered cause is the parties' Joint Motion for Stay of Litigation and Stay of Agency Action Pending Review filed May 31, 2018 (Clerk's Document No. 16). By the motion the parties move the court for the following: (1) a stay of this litigation pending agency rulemaking to reconsider Defendant Consumer Financial Protection...