Filter Results

Type
Issue

Groups Urge DFPI to Prevent Consumer Harm in the Market for Income-Based Advances

The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) should restore cost limits for earned wage advances and other fintech cash advances under proposed regulations rather than allow a temporary registration regime with no cost limits for up to four years, the Center for Responsible Lending, Consumer Federation of California, National Consumer Law Center, and Office of Kat Taylor said...

Consumer, Civil rights, and Labor Groups in California Commend Efforts to Regulate Abusive Fintech Lenders

The undersigned organizations commend the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) for moving to regulate abusive fintech lenders, including earned wage advance providers. We are very pleased to support the proposed rules and encourage the DFPI to vigorously enforce them to ensure that California’s most vulnerable consumers are not harmed. Signatories California Employment Lawyers Association (CELA) CA Labor Federation...

Debt Under Duress: The Economic Impacts of Bail Bonds on San Francisco Bay Area Residents

Nearly 500,000 people are currently detained pretrial in jails around the United States, in part due to high bail amounts set by the judicial system that individuals cannot afford. That is a six-fold increase in the U. S. pretrial population from the 1970s, when it was closer to 83,000 people detained. Bail is money required in exchange for release from...

Group Comment to the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation on Income Share Agreements (ISAs)

On September 25, 2020, Governor Newsom signed AB 1864 (Chapter 157, Statutes of 2020), establishing the California Consumer Financial Protection Law (“CCFPL”) under Division 24 of the Financial Code. The undersigned consumer advocates are encouraged to see that the Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (“DFPI” or the “Department”) is seeking input from stakeholders in developing regulations to implement the...

Comment on Proposed Rulemaking under the California Consumer Financial Protection Law: Earned Wage Access

This set of comments will focus on earned wage access programs and other newer types of payday advance programs. NCLC and CRL have also joined a broader set of comments submitted by the California Economic Justice Coalition on a broader range of issues and a second set in conjunction with the Student Borrower Protection Center on income share agreements. These...

Broad Coalition Comment to Department of Financial Protection and Innovation on Consumer Protection Issues

Our broad coalition of consumer and business organizations thanks you for the opportunity to comment regarding how the DFPI can best implement AB 1864 (Limón), the California Consumer Financial Protection Law (CCFPL). The CCFPL is an important and significant step forward for California and offers the promise of a bold consumer-facing department that can be at the forefront of consumer...

Court System Overload: The State of Debt Collection in California after the Fair Debt Buyer Protection Act

Over the past 50 years, wage stagnation, as well as already high and rising housing, health care, and education costs have dramatically increased debt loads for the average family. Moreover, recovery from the Great Recession has been uneven. Data show that families of color, Americans born after 1970, and households earning less than $60,000 annually are the least likely to...

OCC Proposed Rule Would Invite an Onslaught of Predatory Installment Lending into California

In a September 3 letter to Acting Comptroller of the Currency, Brian Brooks, the Californians for Economic Justice Coalition wrote: California has strong interest rate caps on installment loans intended to protect our residents from predatory loans. Understanding that products like payday loans, car-title loans, and high-cost installment loans at sky high interest rates are merely debt traps for borrowers...

High-Cost Lenders Scheme with Banks to Evade Consumer Protections

A few high-cost lenders are evading state consumer protections through rent-a-bank schemes. Through these sham arrangements, these companies are exploding right through the interest rate limits that most states have put in place for good reason, to protect people from high-cost debt traps that drain them of their hard-earned income. In the following states, payday lenders are using banks, which...

Threat that National Banks Could Help Predatory Lenders Charging 135% to 199% Apr to Evade New California Law

A coalition of 61 consumer, civil rights, and community groups sent letters to three federal bank regulators urging them not to allow their banks to help payday lenders evade state interest rate limits. The groups sent separate letters to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC), which regulates the only banks currently involved in rent-a-bank schemes; the Office of the Comptroller...

Payday and Car Title Lenders Drain Nearly $8 Billion in Fees Every Year

Payday and car-title loans typically carry annual percentage rates (APR) of at least 300%. These high-cost loans are marketed as quick solutions to a financial emergency. Research demonstrates, however, that they frequently lead to debt that is nearly impossible to escape. In addition, these loans are related to a cascade of other financial consequences, such as increased overdraft fees, delinquency...

Student Loan Debt Crisis - Testimony of August 2017

Before the Joint Hearing of the California Assembly Select Committee on Youth and California’s Future and Assembly Banking and Finance Committee Graciela Aponte-Diaz presented the following information in her testimony: First, a snapshot of student loan borrowers, nationally and here in California; Second, highlight major issues with student loan servicing; and Finally, I’d like to provide some policy recommendations for...

CA State Legislature and Attorney General Comment to CFPB on Proposed Rule for Payday and Car Title Lending

The California State Legislature and the California Attorney General, Kamala Harris, both submitted comments to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in favor of strengthening the proposed rule on payday and car-title lending. Download both of the letters with the link above to read the key points laid out to curb these predatory lending practices.

The Drought Continues: Mortgage Credit Runs Dry for Californians of Color

This paper analyzes California mortgage originations in the post-crisis period, from 2012–2014, using data collected under the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA). Similar national analysis provides context for the state-wide observations. Analysis in four large California counties shows the variety of experiences across this large state. The main findings include: National and state-wide analysis reveal a reduction in mortgage credit...

Prepared Remarks of Graciela Aponte-Diaz Before the CFPB Field Hearing on Debt Collection, July 2016

Read Graciela Aponte-Diaz's remarks before the July 2016 CFPB Field Hearing on Debt Collection. The unfair and abusive practices of debt collection in the market can take advantage of financially-distressed consumers or unfairly strip families of wealth. The Great Recession made this financial distress inevitable for many U.S. households. Each year, tens of millions of Americans are pursued by creditors...

Predatory Payday and Larger Installment Loans Overshadow Emerging Market for Smaller, Less Expensive Installment Loans in California

Predatory consumer lending is still flourishing in California. Payday lending continues to be pervasive, capturing borrowers who were sold a short‐term loan in a long‐term cycle of debt. But high‐cost debt trap lending has expanded rapidly in the past few years to much larger loans, including some which are secured by and put a borrower’s car at risk. At the...

CashCall 9th Circuit Amicus Brief

CRL, The Public Good Law Center, and the National Association of Consumer Advocates filed an amicus brief supporting an appeal by plaintiffs asserting that loans made by the payday lender CashCall were unconscionable and violated California's Unfair Competition Law. Courts and the common law have long recognized that excessive interest rates and prices are unconscionable and therefore "unfair" and "unlawful."...

Testimony of Paul Leonard on Rulemaking for Payday

Testimony by Paul Leonard from the May 6, 2015 Informational Hearing on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Rulemaking for Payday, Vehicle Title and Similar Loans before the California Senate Banking Committee. The CFPB aims to cover payday and similar loans under its rule regardless of the provider or channel offering the loans (storefront and online; bank/credit union, non-depository, tribal entity)...

Senate Bill 515 "Reforming Payday Loans"

California payday loan borrowers get caught in a cycle of repeat borrowing of 459% Annual Percentage Rate (APR) loans. Reforms are necessary to ensure that payday loans serve their advertised purpose and better protect consumers. SB 515 proposes a series of reforms to allow payday loans to better serve their advertised purpose while making the loans safer for consumers. Read...

CRL Strongly Supports SB 515 Reforming Payday Loans

SB 515 includes three principal reforms California payday loans: it caps the number of payday loans per borrower at four per year; extends the minimum term of a payday loan, so that borrowers will have more time to accumulate the amounts necessary to repay it; and requires all lenders to apply standardized underwriting guidelines to ensure that borrowers have a...

Reforming the Debt Trap in California

Payday Loans Create a Debt Trap. For California families living paycheck to paycheck, the high price of a payday loan and the fact that it must be paid off in one lump sum two short weeks later virtually ensures that cash-strapped borrowers will be unable to meet their basic expenses and pay off their loan with their next paycheck. Consequently...

Foreclosure Reduction Act: CRL Refutes California Bankers Association's Flawed Claims

The Foreclosure Reduction Act (AB 278 & SB 900) is designed to provide Californians with better safeguards and fair treatment in the foreclosure process. The California Bankers Association and other industry groups recently released a flawed report purporting to show how the bill will extend the foreclosure process and have detrimental economic consequences. The proponents' claims are unsubstantiated and are...

Compromises in the California Homeowner Bill of Rights

During the course of negotiations, the Joint Conference Committee on Mortgage Foreclosures has substantially narrowed the scope of the bill and limited the protections to borrowers relative to the version of the bills that were before the Assembly and Senate Banking Committees earlier this year. Specific changes include: Narrower Scope of Coverage: the final bill includes a number of changes...
Displaying 1 - 25 of 40