The undersigned consumer and civil rights organizations appreciate the opportunity to submit comments on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB or Bureau) 2020 Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (supplemental proposed rule) on debt collection. As organizations dedicated to eliminating abusive financial practices – particularly focused on communities of color and low- to moderate-income consumers – we are deeply concerned about...
We support the CFPB’s decision to conduct additional testing of the validation notice it has proposed and agree that such research is a necessary part of the Bureau’s debt collection rulemaking. As discussed below, we believe that the utility of the research will depend upon: the criteria used to select individuals to participate in the research; and the scope of...
The Center for Responsible Lending (CRL) joined with a coalition of civil rights, community, consumer, and faith organizations in two public comment letters warning the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) that its proposed rule for chartering additional underregulated Industrial Loan Companies (ILCs) would expand predatory, high-interest lending. The plan would grant the predominantly online non-bank companies that are approved for...
This comment includes examples that are intended to be illustrative of the kinds of issues confronting low-to-middle-income households and communities of color attempting to navigate the consumer finance system.
CRL's comment to the Small Business Administration on the April 15 Interim Final Rule implementing the Paycheck Protection Program focuses on two key challenges with the PPP to date: The Paycheck Protection Program continues to be disadvantageous to smaller businesses, and businesses without employees. PPP loans can be forgiven if the business is able to use the funds for eligible...
From the full comment letter: As more borrowers than ever migrate to online platforms, the Department’s role in ensuring program integrity is even more vital. The consensus language in the NPRM represents the best compromise between industry, innovators, and borrowers. If it is changed at all, it should be strengthened, not weakened. The final rule should include the consensus definitions...
From the full comment letter: The Center for Responsible Lending (CRL) and the Center for Community Self-Help (Self-Help) strongly oppose the OCC and FDIC’s proposed Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) regulations.... The most troubling outcome of theproposed rule is that it would unwittingly sanction redlining. The proposal relies on an overly simplistic evaluation measurethat focuses on the total dollar value of...
From the letter: We believe such a rulemaking is necessary to provide much-needed clarity to this thus-far opaque part of the U.S. financial system – that is, the manner in which parent companies and affiliates of ILCs are subject to any kind of federal regulatory or supervisory oversight. By contrast, the federal statutory, regulatory and supervisory framework for parent companies...
First, we note that the affordable housing goals are part of the FHFA’s clearly laid out mission to reach underserved communities and that increasing access to mortgage credit in these communities is essential to the housing recovery. Second, we recommend that the FHFA maintain the two-part test, and strongly urge that the FHFA set a higher benchmark standard and require...
The undersigned community, consumer, civil rights, faith and small business organizations write to strongly oppose the FDIC’s proposed rule on “federal interest rates,” which threatens to eviscerate state interest rate limits around the country and encourage the spread of predatory lending. Download the letter to continue reading. (PDF)