How a High Court Ruling on Tribal Powers May Impact Payday Lending

June 10, 2014
American Banker 
payday lending news
The recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling in a case between the state of Michigan and the Bay Mills Indian Community, which upheld tribal sovereignty in the case of a casino, did not deal with payday lending but mentioned possible limits to tribal authority by suggesting that states could pursue individuals instead. Some observers believe the decision will make it harder for payday lenders to claim that an affiliation with Native American tribes exempts them from state and federal consumer protection laws.

"This case makes clear that sovereign immunity is only immunity from being sued but they are not exempted from complying with the law," said Lauren Saunders, associate director of the National Consumer Law Center. "Payday lenders who claim an affiliation with a tribe claim that they are outside of law [but] that is simply wrong and this says a court can even issue an order against them by doing it through action against an individual."

However, other experts insist it is uncertain whether the ruling can be applied to tribes and affiliated payday lenders. Ronald Rubin, a partner at Hunton & Williams in Washington, says, "The real question is whether or not payday lenders located on Indian lands are actually operating on tribal territory when they make loans to people around the country."









Abstract News © Copyright 2008-2013 INFORMATION, INC.
Powered by Information, Inc.

Stay Updated

Join the fight against predatory lending. Enter your e-mail to sign up for breaking news, action alerts, and CRL's original research.

   Please leave this field empty
  

Help Us End Predatory Lending

Predatory lending destroys family wealth, and preys on our most vulnerable communities. You can help us end abusive lending practices by donating to CRL, or by sharing our work with others.



`